Culture

Indian culture carries the imprint of several thousand years of migration, trade, and conquest, absorbed rather than replaced, which is part of why looking for a single origin is the wrong exercise. Nearly everything covered here arrived from somewhere. Nearly everything covered here is unmistakably Indian. Both are true, and the second does not cancel the first.

Bronze sculpture of four-armed Shiva dancing inside a ring of flames, with one leg raised and long locks of hair spreading outward
Shiva as Lord of Dance (Nataraja), Tamil Nadu, ca. late 11th century. Cast to be carried in procession and seen in motion by lamplight, it is now most often encountered standing still behind glass. Source: The Metropolitan Museum of Art · CC0
Bronze sculpture of four-armed Shiva dancing inside a ring of flames, with one leg raised and long locks of hair spreading outward

Shiva as Lord of Dance (Nataraja), Tamil Nadu, ca. late 11th century. Cast to be carried in procession and seen in motion by lamplight, it is now most often encountered standing still behind glass.

Three habits are worth resisting while reading any of this.

The first is treating antiquity as the measure of value. Some of what follows is genuinely very old: a Tamil literary record spanning over two millennia, a grammar of Sanskrit that behaves like a formal system. This mathematical tradition produced a series of zeros and infinities. But film music has been the country’s popular music for 90 years, cricket provides a vocabulary strangers can use immediately, and the chili in the food arrived in the sixteenth century. Age is a fact about a form, not a claim about its importance.

The second is assuming that “traditional” means unbroken. Most of the classical dance forms performed today were reconstructed in the twentieth century, often by reformers distancing themselves from the hereditary communities that had preserved them. The standard sari drape spread through photography and cinema. A major public festival in Maharashtra was deliberately reorganized in the 1890s for nationalist purposes. Tracing when, by whom, and why people remade something is usually more revealing than tracing how far back it goes.

The third is looking for the center. There isn’t one. The financial center of Indian cinema has moved south; the largest newspaper markets are in Hindi rather than English; the most consequential religious and literary movements often began in vernaculars far from any capital. Any account of Indian culture organized around Delhi, or around Sanskrit, or around what is legible in English, will be describing a fraction and calling it the whole.

Culture is also a way of organizing power, which is why caste appears here rather than only in a society chapter, and why the texts that different Indias have used to explain themselves get a section of their own.